Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tsarion (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete; fails WP:BIO and WP:V covered by WP:RS. Tyranny of dissolving liberties being all well and good, Wikipedia isn't the place. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Tsarion[edit]
- Michael Tsarion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
With reference to the recent nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Schnoebelen and its delete outcome, I find it relevant to consider the Tsarion article again as I believe these too figures pretty much are comparable when it comes to meeting Wikipedia's WP:BIO notability criteria. To be specific I find that the one-sided sourcing from web sites connected with Tsarion or sources that would otherwise not qualify as reliable sources makes this article a candidate for this nomination. __meco (talk) 21:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is deleted you have succumbed to the tyranny of dissolving Liberties — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.135.123 (talk) 04:15, May 19, 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Self-published "author" without much WP:RS going for him. Most of the sources are blogs and such, and the few legitimate sources, unfortunately, are not about him. So WP notability standards are not being met here. Qworty (talk) 04:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:N and doesn't have any WP:RS and per Qworty. Razorflame 21:25, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete I've heard of the guy before but that's not enough. Doesn't meet WP:BIO, so delete. JoshuaZ (talk) 04:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.